3WayLinks versus LinkSerp!
you need, there is no substitute for a Google-friendly 3-way Linking network like Jon Leger’s 3Way Links, or now the new, inexpensive LinkSerp service by David Zohar… But how do you know which one is right for you?
Well, on the one hand Jon Leger pioneered this area. He invented the 3-way network concept and knows Google’s limitations better than anyone else I know. 3WayLinks was the first such network and offers the most ’safety’ for your links, the largest feature set, and of course the biggest customer base. This is clearly all important stuff.
On the other hand, however, LinkSerp gets the same job done at less than half the price. Furthermore, LinkSerp actually gives you an account with 1 Domain’s worth of incoming links (250) for FREE. -Nothing to pay, ever, just 250 high-quality, incoming links to the site of your choice for life!
There are actually many factors that you must consider before picking one of these great networks to build your traffic with, so it would be irresponsible to choose based on price alone. Joining such a network is a major, long-term commitment that you will be stuck with for a long time, so I’d advise you to read this whole page before deciding which is right for you.
What they Both Do:
In case you’ve never used a 3-way linking network before, I’ll start by explaining the whole process just so you see the sheer power and know what they will all have in common.
All such three-way linking networks that I know of require you to pay an ongoing, monthly fee in order to keep receiving the 250 incoming links to each of your websites. First they allow you to pick some keywords that you want to rank well for, and it splits up your allotment of 250 links towards each of those, making them the linking text of your incoming links. (Which is the real ‘currency’ in Google.)
Next, you put a new page on your website for a links page and link to that new page from your home page. (Just one link, anywhere on the index.html page of your site.) In case you were wondering, yes, you MUST have a hosting account of some kind where you can upload files to use any linking service. They give you the file to upload to your server, you only have to set it up the first time and they take care of everything else.
Then, the links start rolling in at a rate between 1 and 8 links a day. For every 1-way link that you receive from someone, the links page on your site gets a link added to it going to some 3rd person’s website.
Finally, after a few weeks you’ll have 250 one-way, incoming links to that site, and your links page will be linking to 250 other websites, but never to the sites that link to you. This results in a very natural-looking set of links that grew randomly over time, just as if you made them the old-fashioned way.
After using a both of these services for 50 of my websites, Each, I have concluded that there simply is no more cost effective way to get incoming links to my many websites, Period. I’m using these services for life, and I have no fear that Google will figure out a way to put a stop to this… Jon’s eBook that I reviewed here months ago, Search Engine Myths Exposed, sums up very well why this is not likely to ever happen.
If they all do all of that, then what could be so different about them?
Lots of things!
For instance, Jon’s network is very strict about what sites it lets in. At the same time, it offers more features, such as a way to see, at a glance, how well the service is working towards your actual rankings in Google.
Meanwhile, LinkSerp lets you choose more keywords per domain to optimize for, meaning that smaller niches can dominate more phrases in a niche market. Pricing structure, too, is very different between them, so although these two services deliver the same end results, they all need to be chosen carefully to fit your particular business model. I’ll hit all the major Issues one by one for you below.
Number of Linking text choices
This is an issue that probably won’t sway your opinion, but is really good to know. 3WayLinks only gives you 3 linking-text choices per domain, split up 60%, 30%, and 10%. This means that you get 150 incoming links with your first keyword’s text as the anchor, 75 links with your 2nd Keyword’s choice, and 25 links for the 3rd keyword. Overall, one 3WayLinks account allows you to rank better in the search engines for 150 keyword phrases in total.
However, the split for Linkserp is much more flexible, giving you 5 choices. 100 links using your first keyword phrase, 75 for your second, 38 for your 3rd, 25 for the 4th, and 12 for the 5th keyword phrase. That’s a total of 250 Keyword phrases you can rank for in Google with one Pro account.
The end effect is that if you are trying to land only 1-3 keyword phrases for your niche, then 3WayLinks can be better, but if you have more keyword phrases, and almost everyone does, then Linkserp is going to give you more selection… And cast a wider net into Google’s stream of traffic.
Size & Stability of Network
Obviously 3wayLinks is a much larger network with many more active members. Their member forums are packed full of helpful users & 7130+ forum posts at the time of this writing. These members seem genuinely helpful and happy to be there, so I would surmise that this is a great, healthy network that isn’t dying out soon.
Meanwhile, Linkserp is pretty much brand new, and faces the same challenges that all new Web 2.0 sites face, which only time will tell if they’ll survive. Even still, with their excellent pricing structure, I am convinced that Linkserp will continue to grow and eat up the market share for all new webmasters simply because it is just as effective as 3WayLinks for less than half the price.
On the upside though, I spoke with the owner of Linkserp and he’s already gotten well over 1,000 members, so there are no worries about getting your 250 links… There certainly are enough people in the system to cover the needs of all new users.
Content Restrictions
Why in the world would 3WayLinks have a problem with a website on Mythology? Christmas shopping? How to get your wife back when she doesn’t love you anymore?
Believe it or not, those are the very topics of three websites I know of personally that were rejected by the 3WayLinks network. The first two were rejected for being “too Religious,” while the third was “not family friendly.”
Yes, I’ve added over 50 other sites without a problem but every now and then some random keywords (such as the word “God” on a mythology site or “Christ” on the Christmas site) will set off their sensors and they simply won’t allow whole websites in because of it.
To date I’ve had no such issues with Linkserp at all. Their FAQs page reads almost word for word what 3WayLinks’ rule on the subject says, but it appears that they have a human making the decision who is much more sensible.
Reporting Features
This is a pretty one-sided issue… Although both systems tell you in real time how many links are coming into and going out of your site, 3WayLinks has the upper hand on reporting with an excellent link-counting panel for each and every one of your keywords… Whereas Linkserp has nothing like that at all.
The 3WayLinks reporting panel is very helpful to let you know how effective your campaigns are. It tells you how high your ranking position is in Google for each keyword. I feel this is a very helpful addition that everyone should be using, so when I asked about it, the owner of Linkserp, David Zohar, assured me that he plans to offer something like it there soon too.
Pricing
Normally I don’t like mentioning prices in my reviews because they change too often, but I’m making an exception today because it will be major factor for most people.
Since Jon knows his system is the first & biggest, he’s charging $47 per month every month. Yes, that’s a lot of money for some, but think about it this way: That account will drive up the rankings for 50 websites that you own. If each of those only makes $1 a day in AdSense earnings (my average sites in there actually make much more, like over $5 a day, but we’ll be conservative) then that’s earning you $1,500 every month. I’d certainly pay $47 to get back $1,500, wouldn’t you?
But again, Linkserp takes the honors on this issue. Accounts at Linkserp are Totally FREE to everyone. Click the link below and you can sign up immediately to receive your free account and get your 250 links to and ONE site of your choice, for life.
It’s when you want to add other domains that you get charged for something. To upgrade from a free account with 1 domain to a “pro” account with 50 domains, it costs a monthly $19.97.
That’s still less than half the price of 3WayLinks, so naturally I expect for everyone who reads this to see the value and run over to grab your free account if not more.
So which is right for you?
Well, the final score appears to be 3-2 in favor of Linkserp. It’s got price, flexibility, and a wonderful lack of content restrictions, while 3WayLinks wins out on the issues of reporting features & network size. Both of those shortcomings I feel confident Linkserp can make up for soon though.
Even still, I urge you to make your choice based on your current & future business plans. It’s all about which issues you feel are important for the operation & growth of your websites.
If you’re just getting started on a limited budget though, you just can’t beat free!
Or…
Click here to Claim your FREE Linkserp account and get 250 Incoming links today!
















June 19th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Thanks for this review, Luke. I was a member of Jon’s site, but had to stop because of a tight cash flow (I still have the link on my home page). I’m gonna check out that new one right now…
June 19th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Great review and great info, Luke! Thanks very much. I’ll be taking advantage of those free links, that’s for sure!
June 19th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
I have started using Jon’s 3-Way Link for 2 months and I have benefited so much in return, though I’ve got 3 of my favorite sites rejected because of the contents. I will definitely sign up for Linkserp for the fr.ee links, Thanks for this wonderful review, Luke!
June 19th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Hey, Luke, how you been. Glad to see how well your progressing in the marketing world. Your review is really honest and I like your approach and comparison style.
Two thumbs up, and I do love your review site. Keep the info coming, I have never tried any of this 3 way linking stuff, but you have paved the road for me to explore this arena.
Thanks again for the heads up,
Alex
http://www.how-to-build-website.com
P.S. With great links even the silliest sites can and will make money. The above site is living proof…
June 19th, 2008 at 11:00 pm
Hey Jon,
Can you do this with blogs?
Thanks!
June 20th, 2008 at 12:16 am
Luke,
I was a member of 3-way and cancelled because all of the sites that were linking to me were pure garbage. Many of them had a gray PR bar and I do not think that those kinds of sites will help at all.
All Google has to do is to find one site in either network and they can spider all sites it links to and the sites those link to and pretty soon they have all sites in the network.
I am too afraid of a penalty to take the risk for what I think is a questionable return.
June 20th, 2008 at 2:39 am
Thanks Luke,
This is a real good review.
It’s good to know in advance that some services limit your freedom to choose your own topics.
Cheers,
JanPaul
June 20th, 2008 at 7:33 am
What a great review. Nothing makes me happier than a new program that is free and get great returns! Thanks Luke!
June 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am
Thanks everyone for the kind response… I had a feeling this review would be welcome to everyone.
Alex:
Good to hear from you again! I’m really glad you stopped by.
Ruth:
But to answer your question, Yes, you can use 3-way linking networks with any online property that allows you to upload a file to your hosting server. That server must allow .php too, but mostly all do these days.
Did you mean me? Jon Leger is the creator of the first service mention, 3WayLinks, and I doubt he’s stopping by this blog any time soon.
Jim:
I agree that many of the sites will be PR0 and unfit for human consumption, but that has never hurt me in any way that I can tell… & I have hundreds of sites in these networks. (Which, by the way, are NOT ugly PR0 sites, so that alone should tell you that it’s worthwhile.)
Think of it this way: If Google decided to penalize your site because too many PR0 or ugly websites were pointing to it, then that would give others the power to sabotage you. -Clearly they can’t allow that or they’d be condoning cyber-terrorism and bad business ethics.
And as for the sites that yours links to, clearly Jon Leger has laid that worry to rest in his “Search Engine Myths Exposed” report earlier. I can concur whole-heartedly with his findings.
June 20th, 2008 at 10:45 am
Hey Luke,
Yea, sorry I did me you. It was really late last night when I posted
June 20th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Luke,
I hope you are rignt, I may give LS a try. I just hope that Google does not decide to crawl these networks because I do not think that they will merely discount the links.
They can very easily tell that you are willfully participating because of your links page that contains links pointing to other sites in the network.
I believe that if they decide that you are willfully trying to game their algorithm they will penalize your site.
All the best,
Jim
June 21st, 2008 at 1:21 am
Hi Luke,
Thanks for the review – Linkserp certainly looks great.
Do they allow you to use just three keywords instead of five? And if so, do they give a 60-30-10 split for those keywords like Jon Leger’s network?
The reason why this is important is that there are many excellent keywords that require around 150 incoming links to get on page 1 of google. So a 60-30-10 split makes more sense instead of the links being diluted among a larger number of keywords.
Thanks!
James
June 21st, 2008 at 8:46 am
Ruth:
No Problem. I’ve done that on other people’s blogs myself.
Jim:
Yes, Google absolutely has both the brains and the brawn to put a stop to it if they really wanted to. However, it’s clear that they aren’t doing so right now, and if they feel the need to one day, they’d have to put up with some mighty consequences, such as sorting by hand ‘allowed’ linking directories from these 3-way linking directories.
Even Yahoo.com is basically just a linking directory, and looks just the same to a spider as these directories do… Nothing identifies them but a big bunch of outgoing links, you know? So if Big G wanted to put a stop to these, they’d have to look closely at all of the “Partner Links” & Link Directories on the entire web. Yeowch.
James:
Even better… I believe you can “Stack” the five keywords, such as putting 1 keyword in all 5 slots and getting all 250 links for one phrase if you want! So if you used blanks 1, 3, & 5 for a single phrase that would equal 150 links… And then the other two would be 75 and 25 links, which I guess you could combine again for 100 links to a secondary phrase.
WARNING: There are good reasons to spread out your text link choices… Only Stack if you know what you are doing! (Such as have other incoming links on other phrases already showing in Google’s index.)
June 21st, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Luke,
I would agree if Google were only able to find these networks by accident.
What worries me the most is when a site comes from nowhere to knock someone out of their position in the SERPS that they will complain to Google.
Matt Cutts has publicly stated that anyone who believes that a site is using paid links, should report it to Google.
Or what if a Google employee hears about the newwork and joins?
They have to find just one site. They can then follow all of the links from that site’s links page to other sites in the network. All of those sites will be in the network because the network feeds the contents of the links pages via PHP or javascript or whatever…
They would then do the same with the links page of each of those sites and so on until they ran out of new links. They would then pretty much have found everyone in the network.
They will know that everyone who places a links page on their site that contains links to the network has willfully done so.
That being the case and knowing Google I would bet that penaltys will be doled out to every site that they believe is in the network.
I had a site that was making $5,000.00 per month that, after a penalty is now making $50.00 per month. I was on the first page of Google for many of my keywords and now cannot be found at all in big G. The traffic I currently get comes from MSN.
Anyway the dangers are very real, a site that is not doing much can get a penalty and it will probably never be noticed. One that is generating income should be carefully protected.
I will try a few new sites and see if they go anywhere but I do not think that it is worth it to risk an established site.
June 21st, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Hi again Jim,
Every Ad online, all 30 Trillion of them daily, is a paid link. Every last one. Even Adsense ads!
Google is forced to be very, very specific on what it penalizes under the banner of being a “Paid Link.”
The definition that google has given is much too specific to include linking networks such as 3-way link networks. No one to date has ever complained, to my knowledge, that such a 2 or 3 way linking network’s link was penalized by google as a “Paid Link.”
Technically, they would be EXCHANGED links anyway, and you’re only paying to become part of the network.
Hope that helps!
Luke
June 21st, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Luke,
Thanks for your response, you seem pretty sure so I will take your word on it and move forward.
If I get into trouble I will come back here and whine about it, I am kidding ;0)
Later,
Jim
June 21st, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Hi Luke, using Linkserp and 3Waylinks, the end result (as far as links are concerned) is 250 links in and 250 links out. All this while, I thought we should get more links to come in, but now we have a huge amount of links going out as well.
I would like your thoughts on this in terms of (1) search engine placing (2)Page Rank.
Another thing I am concerned about is the kind of sites linking to mine. For example, if I have a site specially on Gardening, and virtually all the links are from non-gardening sites. Would that look kind of suspicious and weird to the search engine?
Thank Luke, I look forward to your response.
June 22nd, 2008 at 5:27 pm
Hi Lina,
The way PageRank works has nothing to do with the difference in incoming to outgoing links. If that were the case, directories like Yahoo.com or DMOZ could never have any PageRank. They are just huge websites filled with nothing but outbound links, and yet they have very high pagerank.
So basically links to you count as “good,” and links away from you can also count as “good” in some circumstances, such as in determining relevancy.
I have actually tested making a site and ONLY linking it to PR 8 & 9 authority sites, having no incoming links, and believe it or not it got high pagerank itself! -But no traffic. :p
As for your 2nd question, Jon Leger’s report “Search Engine Myths Exposed” answers it perfectly. You can download that from the link above. In a nutshell he proves that only SOME of them need to be relevant, something like 30% I believe.
Both 3WL and Linkserp will attempt to get sites in the same category linking to yours first. -So matching 30% shouldn’t be a problem unless you’re in an extremely weird niche market that no one else is even close to.
June 26th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
Luke,
I am a fan and have purchased some of your products – great work! I am very impressed to see you doing things ‘right’ and giving some great insight on some products. I respect your opinion and will purchase through you over some of these guru IM’ers because you are honest and you give more then take. I am starting online and plan to follow in your integrating.
June 30th, 2008 at 2:58 am
Hi Luke, after reading your review and your answers to questions posted here, I went ahead and signed up for the FREE account 8 days ago to try it out on my 1-month-old website. Indeed, the number of inbound and outbound links worked like clockwork. Linkserp has so far posted about 30 inbound links. However, when I checked the backlinks to my website using Google Toolbar, none of these links were indexed by Google, MSN or Yahoo! For example, prior to signing up Linkserp, I have X links in Yahoo! I just checked the stats just now and the number of links in Yahoo! remained X. Could you kindly enlighten me on this please?
June 30th, 2008 at 7:30 am
Jason,
The reason you are not seeing the backlinks yet is that it takes time for the search engines to find them.
If the sites linking to you are not already in the SE’s indexes they will not be crawled and will there fore not show up.
It also takes time after a site is crawled before the information shows up in the index. Google has a habit of only showing a few of your back links.
It is probably best to rely on Yahoo to find most of your backlinks.
One strategy might be to join various sites like Squidoo and build some links to the websites that link to you. That will help to get them crawled and some the link love will be passed on to your site.
Jimn
July 8th, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Hi Luke,
I signed up for Linkserp after reading your review. I put in one site into their system to see how it works out.
I’m disappointed to say that after over two weeks, there are just 20 incoming links into my site. (There are 61 outgoing links, though!)
Linkserp seems to be stingy with incoming links from what I can tell. At this rate, I doubt that I would be shelling out money to sign up for their pro account – I think the money is better spent on 3waylinks, even though its much more expensive.
The thing is, it would take too long to get a reasonable amount of incoming links. Now, with a free account, I can’t complain, but if they want me to upgrade to a paid account, they better deliver more than they have so far – and fast!
Thanks for your well-written review, though. I will be checking back on your blog often.
Jill
July 9th, 2008 at 1:31 am
Hi Jill,
I think you should be happy that they take it slow and easy. You know there are people who say that you should not build more than 3 to 4 links per week. Too fast is not good at all.
JanPaul
July 9th, 2008 at 10:08 am
Jason:
Jim is absolutely correct, it does take time for google to find just about all links online, unless it’s something like a Digg.com story that is very time-sensitive.
Failing that, Google doesn’t always find all links, and even if it does, they don’t REPORT that they find all links. (The reason that for any given “Links:” search you’ll find fewer backlinks in google than you will in Yahoo.)
If you really want to make sure that google has found each and every one of your incoming links, the only trick I know that works is to submit each PAGE THAT YOUR LINK IS ON to a service like Pingoat.com or Pingomatic.
Jill:
Slowness in building is something that many people hope for, it’s true, but oddly enough, I’ve had pretty much just the opposite happen on one of my accounts…
I have a pro account at linkserp with 50 sites shoved into it and they have been growing links at different speeds. Most of them grew an average of 5 links a day, a few as slow as 2 links a day, but one account has ‘hit the mother load’ and grew (possibly too fast) by 8 links a day solidly.
So he really meant it when he said “randomly.”
Hope that helps!
July 11th, 2008 at 10:01 am
I have been a member of 3ways link about 3 months, nothing much changed on my ranking due to high competetion on my keyword. I’m thinking to change it.
thanks luke
July 14th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Hi Luke, I mentioned in my earlier post that after reading your review, I decided to go for the FREE account to try it out. So this is just an update. Its Day 23 today and the stats are as follow:
(1) Incoming links – 30
(2) Outgoing links – 107!
(3) Number of links (from Linkserp) picked up by Yahoo!, Google
and MSN – 0
Frankly speaking, I don’t think this stuff works!
July 14th, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Hi Luke,
I’m also on Day 23 of my affair with Linkserp.com! (like Jason above). Here are my stats.
Incoming links: 23
Outgoing links: 95
Over the past week, the number of incoming links has gone up from 21 to 23 – just two additional links the whole week!
At the same time, the number of outgoing links has increased from 52 to 95.
Out of the 23 incoming links, 3 show up in yahoo site explorer.
Anyway, I’ve signed up for the pro version and will test it out with lots more sites. Let’s see how it goes.
Thanks and regards,
July 15th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
Hi Luke,
I have more or less the same experience with Linkserp as the folks above.
At the current rate of building incoming links, it will take Linkserp the better part of a year to get up to 250 links. I’m all for slow link building, but this is waaay too slow.
I think the harsh reality is that these newer services simply do not have enough sites in the system. Or perhaps they do not have enough fresh sites coming in – which is where the bulk of the incoming links will come from.
Hopefully, things will change for the better.
Best,
John
July 18th, 2008 at 3:29 am
Hi guys, this is just an update on my Linkserp stats:
On July 14 (Day 23), I reported it here as:
Incoming Links – 30
Outgoing Links – 107
Today (Day 27), July 18, 2008
Incoming Links – 30
Outgoing Links – 122
The incoming links stopped in the last 4 days. This doesn’t look good at all. I am going to wait another 3 days (Day 30). If things remain the same, I will most likely remove the links page and close the Free account.
What’s your latest stats Stan? Any others who would like to share your experience with Linkserp?
July 18th, 2008 at 6:06 am
Hi everyone,
I had signed up for a Pro account with linkserp and put in 4 additional sites. They got approved in about 48 hours, which is fine.
Well, Linkserp seems to have gone beserk with these four sites. Here are the stats:
Site 1:
Incoming links: 11
Outgoing links: 15
Site 2:
Incoming links: 19
Outgoing links: 11
Site 3:
Incoming links: 10
Outgoing links: 10
Site 4:
Incoming links: 12
Outgoing links: 13
My original free site:
Incoming links: 24
Outgoing links: 111
As you can see, the link addition these past two days has been far faster as compared to what my original free site received.
Well, so far, I’m quite satisfied with the progress. I’m continuing to add more sites to the account.
Oh, btw, I added adsense to my original site a few days ago – it’s now earning about $1.5 per day! Apart from some social bookmarking links, the only other links in at the moment are linkserp links. Pretty decent performance, I would say, considering that it is a new site.
Thanks!
Stan
July 18th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
It appears that the free sites are treated a bit differently than paid sites…
July 19th, 2008 at 1:03 am
Hi,
Its less than 24 hours since I made my last comment above and here are the updated link counts: (figures in brackets are the link counts in my previous post)
Site 1:
Incoming links: 17 (11)
Outgoing links: 20 (15)
Site 2:
Incoming links: 24 (19)
Outgoing links: 20 (11)
Site 3:
Incoming links: 13 (10)
Outgoing links: 18 (10)
Site 4:
Incoming links: 18 (12)
Outgoing links: 18 (13)
My original free site:
Incoming links: 24 (24)
Outgoing links: 117 (111)
Now I’m getting nervous. They’ve added 24 incoming links to one of my sites in about 2.5 days time. That may be a bit too fast.
It does appear that free sites are treated differently from paid ones, like Jinm commented. Perhaps they use free sites as fodder to get links to the paid sites. Not a very smart strategy, because if the folks who own the free sites don’t see enough link growth, they will simply delete those outgoing links and opt out of the system.
On the other hand, if they grow links too rapidly, that may also convince some people to get out of the system.
Talk about getting hit at both ends…
Luke, perhaps you might be able to tell the owner to change things a bit? I once put in a ticket asking about the slow link growth to my free site…its been over two weeks and there’s no response. You might be able to carry more weight with the owner.
Best,
Stan
July 19th, 2008 at 3:45 am
Very good postings from Jimn and Stan. Keep it up.
I just checked by Linkserp stats:
As stated yesterday,
Incoming – 30
Outgoing – 122
Today
Incoming – 31
Outgoing – 127
The incoming links are way,way,way too slow. Jimn and Stan, I think what you said about the treatment of paid and free sites do have basis. Yeap, I agree – not a smart business strategy if true.
July 20th, 2008 at 6:06 am
My stats for today (July 20) is:
Incoming – 33
Outgoing – 135
Yesterday it was 31/127
The day before – 30/122
Not a pretty picture, if you ask me.
July 21st, 2008 at 3:18 am
Here are my stats currently. The numbers in brackets represent the stats 2 and 3 days ago respectively.
Site 1:
Incoming links: 26 (17, 11)
Outgoing links: 29 (20, 15)
Site 2:
Incoming links: 36 (24, 19)
Outgoing links: 37 (20, 11)
Site 3:
Incoming links: 26 (13, 10)
Outgoing links: 37 (18, 10)
Site 4:
Incoming links: 35 (18, 12)
Outgoing links: 27 (18, 13)
My original free site:
Incoming links: 25 (24, 24)
Outgoing links: 132 (117, 111)
As you can see, the original free site is still being used as fodder to provide links to other sites – the rate of link growth continues to be abysmally low.
And on site 2, they’ve built 36 incoming links in 5 days. That’s 7.2 links a day. Uncomfortably fast. Especially since the link growth isn’t going to continue forever.
Haven’t decided yet, but I may ditch this system and go with 3waylinks, despite Linkserp being a clear bargain. At least Jon Leger knows what he is doing, even if he is whimsical about approving sites.
Best,
Stan
July 21st, 2008 at 4:37 am
Today is Day 30 of signing up for the FREE Linkserp account. The stats today is
Incoming – 33
Outgoing – 143
Yesterday, it was 33, 135
I will cancel my FREE account and take down the links page on my website tonight. Like many stuff out there, Linkserp is only good on paper. Luckily it was a Free account, otherwise its 20 bucks down the drain.
July 23rd, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Thank everyone for the interesting running commentary… I’m keeping my linkserp account because it’s building at a fairly steady rate of ~7 a day, and the incoming links far outweigh the outgoings. (3 for 1, usually!)
I seem to be the opposite of Jason in that regard… Perhaps we’re in the same 3-way circle and he’s linking to me but there isn’t enough ppl in the 3rd position yet so I’m not linking to anyone in the 3rd slot. -Meanwhile, the 3rd slot isn’t present to link to Jason.
Sorry Jason! -In that case, you should be pushing for more folks to sign up!
-Happy
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 pm
Hey Happy,
Your post sounds a little suspicious to me…
Do you really think that Jason’s problem is that he is not working hard enough to build someone else’s business?
Hmmm…
July 25th, 2008 at 7:47 am
Of course not, Jim! I’m saying that the way the cookie crumbled just happened to work in my favor and not in Jason’s.
I only said that last line as a comic aside (hence the smiley) to put Jason at ease… Perhaps not the best way to go about it but hey, it’s just my sense of humor.
July 25th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Happy,
Sorry…
LOL
)
July 26th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
I guess you can’t lose anything by trying the free approach. And if traffic grows then move to the paid. Do you think the networks are different enought to sign up for both eventually?